Tallinn adalah ibu kota dan kota terpadat di Estonia. Terletak di sebuah teluk di Estonia utara, di tepi Teluk Finlandia di Laut Baltik, kota ini berpenduduk 456.518 jiwa pada tahun 2025 dan secara administratif terletak di County Harju. Tallinn adalah pusat pemerintahan, keuangan, industri, dan budaya utama Estonia. 1. Stasiun Baltik pada malam hari, 1976. 2. Kafe "Tuljak, 1974. 3. Tallinn pada malam musim dingin, 1971. 4. Distrik Mustamäe, 1976. 5. Kawasan kota tua Tallinn dari kaki Bukit Toompea, 1975. 6. Pemandangan Tallinn dari atas Bukit Toompea, 1978. 7. Gereja St.Nicholas, 1970. 8. Pelabuhan Tallinn, 1974. 9. Asosiasi Produksi Barang Rajutan ''Marat'', 1976. 10. Menara meriam Kiek in de Kök, di lereng selatan Bukit Toompea, 1978. Source/Reference http://thetallinncollector.com/
Maybe I didn't provide enough context in my previous post where I said that I hate people who lock their profiles or accounts on Facebook. I have no problem with people locking their profiles but hopefully it's for a good reason not for a bad reason. I understand that it's part of their privacy but it's risky. That raises some questions about security. If you want to send them friend requests, that should be questioned by them, and if they want to send you friend requests, that should be questioned by you.
In some social networking services (SNS) with a friending system like Facebook, we can't just befriend someone, especially if they are strangers (without at least one mutual friend). We have to know who they are based on their public information before we accept their request. I have received friend requests from people like that a few times in the past and because they were fake accounts I unfriended them. Not to be racist, some of them were perverted ahh Indian men who like pictures of "bobs and vegana". No wonder they have high r4p3 rate.
Have you ever experienced a "haha reaction" bombardment on your public posts on Facebook, especially old posts? It's really suck if we want to find out who they are but they locked their potentially criminal alike profile. To stalkers, if you want to stalk don't react the posts. Luckily on most SNS they only have one type of reaction, mostly "love" or "like". So the reaction was more like a care to a post than a real reaction. I think most people seem to be using the reaction feature on Facebook incorrectly, at least since the late 2010s.
Don't think that this is just on the internet and not 'real life', internet is part of real life even if you pretend to be someone else (like creating alt accounts). Do you think that if you commit a crime (depending on jurisdiction) on the internet you will not be prosecuted? It is important to include morality here and if this is not important, why have community guidelines or standards in the first place? Of course for the common good of all users. However, since morality is relative, what can be considered good or bad can vary from person to person.
In some social networking services (SNS) with a friending system like Facebook, we can't just befriend someone, especially if they are strangers (without at least one mutual friend). We have to know who they are based on their public information before we accept their request. I have received friend requests from people like that a few times in the past and because they were fake accounts I unfriended them. Not to be racist, some of them were perverted ahh Indian men who like pictures of "bobs and vegana". No wonder they have high r4p3 rate.
Have you ever experienced a "haha reaction" bombardment on your public posts on Facebook, especially old posts? It's really suck if we want to find out who they are but they locked their potentially criminal alike profile. To stalkers, if you want to stalk don't react the posts. Luckily on most SNS they only have one type of reaction, mostly "love" or "like". So the reaction was more like a care to a post than a real reaction. I think most people seem to be using the reaction feature on Facebook incorrectly, at least since the late 2010s.
Don't think that this is just on the internet and not 'real life', internet is part of real life even if you pretend to be someone else (like creating alt accounts). Do you think that if you commit a crime (depending on jurisdiction) on the internet you will not be prosecuted? It is important to include morality here and if this is not important, why have community guidelines or standards in the first place? Of course for the common good of all users. However, since morality is relative, what can be considered good or bad can vary from person to person.
Comments
Post a Comment
Just say it, don't be shy.